If your business is facing a trademark opposition or cancellation before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), you’re likely wondering how long the process will take, what it will cost, and whether fighting it out is really the best path forward. The truth is that while the TTAB is a powerful forum for resolving trademark disputes, most cases never go all the way to a final decision. Instead, they are resolved through settlement agreements.
Why Settlement is Common in TTAB Cases
The TTAB process is thorough, but it can also be lengthy and expensive. From initial pleadings to discovery, motions, and trial briefs, a contested opposition or cancellation can last years. Settlement, on the other hand, offers a practical solution that can:
-
Save costs: TTAB litigation often requires extensive attorney time for pleadings, discovery, and trial preparation. A settlement can dramatically cut legal bills.
-
Save time: Entrepreneurs want to focus on building their businesses, not spending years embroiled in disputes.
-
Reduce risk: TTAB judges can be unpredictable. Even a strong case carries some risk of loss. Settling allows parties to control the outcome.
Because of these benefits, the Board itself encourages parties to negotiate. In fact, the TTAB will often suspend proceedings if both sides inform the Board they are engaged in settlement talks .
Strategic Timing of Settlement Discussions
One of the most important aspects of settlement is when to negotiate. Some parties begin discussions immediately after an opposition is filed. Others wait until after discovery, when both sides better understand the strengths and weaknesses of the case.
Early settlement often means lower costs, but it can be harder to reach an agreement when neither party has seen the other’s evidence. Settling later may provide leverage once facts are clearer, but it also means legal expenses may already be significant.
A savvy approach is to explore settlement throughout the case, while also diligently meeting deadlines and preserving your rights. TTAB rules make clear that ongoing negotiations do not excuse missed filings .
Common Forms of TTAB Settlements
Settlement at the TTAB does not always mean one side gives up entirely. Creative solutions can resolve disputes while allowing both parties to continue using their marks under certain conditions. Common agreements include:
1. Coexistence Agreements
The parties agree that both trademarks can exist, often by carving out specific geographic markets, product categories, or channels of trade. For example, one business may agree to use its mark only for apparel, while the other uses it for software.
2. Consent Agreements
One party formally consents to the registration of the other’s mark. These agreements often include restrictions to prevent consumer confusion, such as differences in logos or target markets.
3. Amendments to Applications or Registrations
Applicants may agree to narrow the scope of their goods or services to avoid overlap with the other party. For example, an applicant for “coffee” may limit its goods to “coffee-flavored candy.”
4. Withdrawals and Abandonment
Sometimes, the most straightforward resolution is for one party to withdraw an opposition or abandon a challenged application, usually in exchange for concessions like compensation or restrictions on future filings.
Key Considerations When Negotiating a TTAB Settlement
When exploring settlement, entrepreneurs should keep several strategic points in mind:
-
Clarity is critical: Agreements should be detailed and specific. Vague terms can lead to future disputes.
-
Think long-term: Consider not only your current use of the mark but also how you may expand in the future. A settlement that seems harmless now could restrict your growth later.
-
Confidentiality: Many businesses prefer to keep settlement terms private. Well-drafted agreements include confidentiality clauses.
-
Board approval: Some settlements require the TTAB’s involvement, especially if the resolution involves amendments to an application or registration. Ensuring compliance with TTAB rules is essential.
Practical Example: A Startup vs. a Major Brand
Imagine a tech startup applies for a trademark that a major corporation believes is too close to one of its own. The corporation files an opposition, and the startup suddenly faces a lengthy TTAB battle.
Through settlement, the parties could agree that:
-
The startup may use its mark for mobile applications but not for hardware devices.
-
The corporation agrees not to oppose the startup’s application if these restrictions are added.
-
Both sides agree not to challenge future applications that respect the same boundaries.
This type of resolution allows the startup to secure trademark rights, avoids litigation costs, and ensures that the corporation’s core brand remains protected.
The Risks of Refusing to Settle
Not every case can or should be settled. Sometimes, principles or competitive realities require litigation. However, refusing to consider settlement carries risks:
-
Financial strain: TTAB proceedings can drag on for years, consuming resources better spent on growing your business.
-
Uncertain outcomes: Even strong evidence may not guarantee success.
-
Distraction: Ongoing disputes can distract leadership teams from core business operations.
In many cases, the risks of prolonged litigation outweigh the benefits, making settlement the more strategic option.
How Entrepreneurs Can Approach Settlement Talks
If you’re facing a TTAB case, here are steps to take:
-
Consult experienced counsel: An attorney can help evaluate your case, your leverage, and potential settlement options.
-
Stay professional: Keep communication with the opposing party respectful and clear. Hostile interactions rarely lead to favorable deals.
-
Document everything: Settlement discussions should be reduced to writing, ideally in the form of a signed stipulation filed with the TTAB .
-
Stay proactive: Don’t wait until deadlines loom to start negotiations. Proactive communication can create opportunities for creative resolutions.
Final Thoughts
Settlement is not a sign of weakness, it is a sign of smart business strategy. For entrepreneurs and startups, the role of settlement in TTAB cases cannot be overstated. It allows you to control the outcome, reduce costs, and protect your brand without years of uncertainty.
At Cohn Legal, PLLC, we view ourselves as more than lawyers, we are your legal consigliere. We simplify complex processes, protect your dreams, and help you focus on what really matters: growing your business.
If you are navigating a TTAB opposition or cancellation, let’s talk. The first consultation is always free, and we’ll help you explore whether settlement is the right move for your brand.