Cohn Legal, PLLC represents entrepreneurs, startups, businesses, technology companies, manufacturers, and established brand owners in Baton Rouge and throughout Louisiana in federal trademark matters before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
Our trademark practice includes brand clearance, federal trademark applications, USPTO Office Action responses, trademark oppositions and cancellations, trademark enforcement and defense, trademark assignments and licensing, international trademark protection, and broader trademark portfolio strategy.
START YOUR TRADEMARK REGISTRATION
SCHEDULE A TRADEMARK CONSULTATION
Cohn Legal does not maintain a physical office in Baton Rouge or elsewhere in Louisiana. The firm represents Louisiana businesses remotely in federal trademark matters before the USPTO and TTAB.
Federal Trademark Services for Baton Rouge Businesses
Cohn Legal assists Baton Rouge businesses throughout the trademark lifecycle, from evaluating a proposed brand before launch through federal registration, prosecution, enforcement, licensing, and contested proceedings.
Trademark Clearance Searches
Before substantial resources are committed to a new company name, product, technology, restaurant concept, energy service, software platform, logo, or other commercial identity, Cohn Legal can evaluate potentially conflicting trademark rights and assess risks associated with adoption and registration.
LEARN ABOUT TRADEMARK SEARCHES
Federal Trademark Applications
Cohn Legal prepares and prosecutes federal trademark applications before the USPTO, including applications based on existing use in commerce and bona fide intent to use a mark in the future.
LEARN ABOUT FEDERAL TRADEMARK REGISTRATION
USPTO Office Action Responses
If the USPTO raises legal or procedural objections to an application, Cohn Legal assists applicants with evaluating the refusal and developing an appropriate response.
LEARN ABOUT OFFICE ACTION RESPONSES
Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations
Cohn Legal represents trademark applicants and owners in contested proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, including opposition and cancellation matters.
Trademark Enforcement and Defense
The firm advises trademark owners and accused parties regarding cease-and-desist demands, infringement issues, enforcement strategy, potential defenses, settlement, and related trademark disputes.
LEARN ABOUT TRADEMARK ENFORCEMENT
Trademark Assignments, Licensing, and Portfolio Matters
Cohn Legal assists businesses with ownership transfers, licensing arrangements, coexistence and consent agreements, international protection, and development of broader trademark portfolios.
Trademark Protection for Businesses in Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Baton Rouge serves as the center of a regional economy with substantial activity in energy, chemicals and process industries, manufacturing, healthcare and life sciences, logistics and distribution, technology, construction, professional services, and research.
The Greater Baton Rouge Economic Partnership currently identifies energy, healthcare and life sciences, logistics and distribution, process industries, and technology among the Capital Region’s principal target sectors. Louisiana Economic Development similarly identifies energy and process industries, life sciences, logistics, technology, aerospace and defense, professional services, and agribusiness among important sectors of the statewide economy.
For Baton Rouge companies operating in these sectors, trademarks can become important commercial assets well before a business reaches a national audience.
An energy company may develop separate names for technologies, services, equipment, and products. A healthcare or life sciences venture may use different brands for the company, research platform, medical product, software, or diagnostic service. A technology company may separately brand its corporate identity and individual software offerings. A manufacturer may operate under one house mark while selling multiple product lines under additional trademarks.
Trademark questions can therefore arise before a company ever files an application with the USPTO.
A founder might form a Louisiana entity, register a trade name, obtain a domain, secure social-media handles, commission a logo, produce packaging, order signage, build software, or begin advertising before determining whether the proposed mark creates a meaningful trademark risk.
None of those steps necessarily establishes that the mark is legally available.
Trademark conflicts also do not require two marks to be identical.
The USPTO may refuse registration when an applied-for mark is sufficiently similar to an earlier mark and the respective goods or services are sufficiently related that consumers may mistakenly believe they come from the same source.
Similarity can arise from appearance, sound, pronunciation, meaning, wording, or overall commercial impression.
This can be especially important for Baton Rouge businesses because many of the region’s core industries naturally operate beyond Louisiana.
An industrial company may sell products nationally. An energy-services company may work on projects across multiple states. A technology company may provide software remotely throughout the country. A healthcare technology venture may develop a product for national distribution. A logistics company may operate through interstate supply chains.
Baton Rouge’s transportation infrastructure also reinforces this broader commercial reach. The region promotes its Mississippi River access, interstate connections, rail systems, airport infrastructure, warehousing, and inland-port capabilities as significant advantages for logistics and distribution businesses.
As a result, finding no identically named company in Baton Rouge does not establish that a proposed mark is available.
Federal registrations are also not the only potential source of trademark rights.
Depending on the circumstances, another party may possess relevant common-law trademark rights through marketplace use even if it has never federally registered the mark.
A meaningful trademark clearance analysis may therefore extend beyond searching for an identical name in the USPTO database.
Timing matters as well.
Businesses may invest substantial resources in research, engineering, equipment, packaging, software development, signage, websites, product design, advertising, investor materials, manufacturing arrangements, or distribution before a brand formally enters the marketplace.
Discovering a substantial trademark conflict after those investments have been made can make changing the name considerably more disruptive.
For that reason, Cohn Legal approaches trademark clearance as a legal risk analysis rather than simply asking whether an identical name appears in a database.
LEARN ABOUT COHN LEGAL’S TRADEMARK SEARCH SERVICES
Trademark Considerations for Baton Rouge Energy and Process Industry Companies
Energy and process industries are among the most distinctive components of the Baton Rouge economy.
The Greater Baton Rouge Economic Partnership describes the region’s energy sector as rooted in refining, chemicals, and heavy manufacturing, supported by pipelines, transportation infrastructure, industrial facilities, and a specialized workforce. It separately identifies process manufacturing as a major regional target sector.
Companies operating in these industries can develop complex trademark portfolios.
An industrial company may use one corporate trademark while separately branding equipment, technologies, chemicals, materials, software systems, engineering services, environmental solutions, or other commercial offerings.
Federal registration of the corporate name does not automatically create federal registrations for every separately branded product or service.
Each commercially important mark should therefore be evaluated based on its particular use.
Brand ownership can also become an issue in industrial transactions.
Energy and manufacturing businesses frequently work through joint ventures, subsidiaries, technology licenses, acquisitions, contractor relationships, and other sophisticated commercial arrangements.
If a new technology or service brand is created within one of those arrangements, the parties should understand who owns the trademark, which entity has the right to file an application, whether affiliates or contractors are authorized to use the mark, and what happens to the brand if the underlying business relationship terminates.
The same issue arises in acquisitions.
A transaction transferring equipment, facilities, contracts, patents, or other assets does not necessarily resolve ownership of associated trademarks unless the relevant rights are properly included in the transaction documents.
Trademark ownership and chain of title can therefore form part of a broader intellectual-property strategy.
The Baton Rouge region continues to see substantial investment involving industrial distribution, specialty chemicals, manufacturing, and logistics. For example, a 2025 Baton Rouge expansion announced by Louisiana Economic Development involved new logistics infrastructure supporting specialty chemicals and advanced-materials industries.
For companies developing new technology or services before commercial launch, a federal intent-to-use application may also be relevant.
Where the statutory requirements are satisfied, a Section 1(b) application permits an applicant with a bona fide intention to use a mark in commerce to begin the federal application process before qualifying commercial use has commenced.
LEARN ABOUT INTENT-TO-USE TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS
Trademark Strategy for Baton Rouge Healthcare, Life Sciences, and Research Ventures
Healthcare and life sciences represent another important part of the Baton Rouge economy.
The Greater Baton Rouge Economic Partnership identifies Healthcare & Life Sciences as a target sector and describes a regional ecosystem connecting hospitals, universities, biotechnology businesses, medical technology, clinical research, and academic-industry collaboration.
Companies in these industries often develop intellectual property long before a commercial product is introduced.
A biotechnology company may develop patents around an invention. A software developer may own copyrights in code. A research company may protect confidential processes or data through trade-secret law.
Trademark protection serves a different purpose.
Trademark law concerns the names, logos, and other source identifiers under which goods and services are offered in the marketplace.
A life sciences business might therefore have one trademark for the company itself and other marks for a diagnostic platform, medical technology, research tool, laboratory service, software system, or product family.
Protecting the company name does not automatically provide separate registrations for each commercial product name.
Research commercialization can create additional ownership questions.
If a startup licenses technology from a university, acquires intellectual property from another company, or develops technology through a joint research arrangement, the right to use the underlying technology does not automatically establish ownership of every associated commercial brand.
The applicable agreements should be reviewed to determine who owns or may use the relevant trademarks.
Timing can also be particularly important in healthcare and life sciences because products may remain in development for a substantial period before commercial launch.
A company may already be using a proposed name internally, in investor presentations, on a development website, or in discussions with commercial partners long before qualifying trademark use begins.
Where appropriate, an intent-to-use filing can allow the business to begin pursuing federal trademark protection while development is still underway.
Trademark Considerations for Baton Rouge Technology Companies
Technology is also an identified growth sector in the Capital Region.
The Greater Baton Rouge Economic Partnership describes the region’s technology ecosystem as involving software, information technology, cybersecurity, analytics, digital-twin development, high-performance computing, and other emerging technologies supported by LSU, Southern University, and regional employers.
Technology businesses often develop multiple trademarks rapidly.
A company might begin with only a corporate name but later establish separate names for its software platform, application, AI tool, cybersecurity product, developer service, data platform, or enterprise offering.
Each mark can create separate clearance and filing questions.
This is especially important because technology businesses frequently compete nationally from launch.
A software company physically located in Baton Rouge may provide services to users throughout the United States. Its relevant trademark landscape is therefore not confined to Louisiana competitors.
A local business-name search or internet search may fail to identify a federal trademark registration, pending application, or earlier common-law user that presents a meaningful risk.
Technology startups should also consider trademark ownership when the original founder develops a name before forming the operating company.
If the brand was initially adopted or used individually, the business should consider whether any resulting rights should be transferred to the company that will own and exploit the trademark going forward.
These ownership issues may become important during investment, due diligence, acquisitions, or licensing transactions.
Trademark Protection for Baton Rouge Logistics and Distribution Businesses
Baton Rouge’s geographic position along the Mississippi River and its road, rail, port, and air connections make logistics and distribution particularly relevant to the region.
The Greater Baton Rouge Economic Partnership identifies Logistics & Distribution as one of its target sectors and emphasizes the region’s multimodal transportation connections and inland-port infrastructure.
Transportation and logistics brands frequently operate across state lines by their nature.
A Baton Rouge logistics company may use its brand in connection with freight services, warehousing, distribution, transportation management, tracking software, or specialized industrial services offered to customers across the United States.
A company entering these markets should therefore not assume that a name is available simply because another Baton Rouge company does not use it.
Trademark clearance should consider potentially relevant rights in the broader marketplace.
Logistics businesses may also develop multiple marks as operations expand.
One mark may identify the company, while separate marks identify software, transportation programs, specialized services, technology systems, or business divisions.
Businesses should determine which brands are commercially important enough to warrant separate clearance and potential registration.
Louisiana Business Registration vs. Federal Trademark Registration
Registering a corporation, limited liability company, trade name, or other business filing in Louisiana is not the same as obtaining federal trademark protection.
Business registration generally concerns the legal entity or business identity under which an organization operates. Trademark law concerns words, names, symbols, logos, designs, slogans, and other identifiers used to distinguish the source of particular goods or services.
Louisiana separately provides for registration of trade names, trademarks, and service marks through the Louisiana Secretary of State.
The Secretary of State’s current filing materials provide separate registration, reservation, assignment, and cancellation procedures for trade names, trademarks, and service marks. The state’s trademark registration form also asks applicants to identify both the date of first use generally and the date the mark was first used in Louisiana.
Louisiana business-name registration and trademark registration therefore serve different purposes.
The Secretary of State also cautions that preliminary name-availability searches are only preliminary and should not be relied upon as a definitive determination of rights.
Likewise, Louisiana state trademark registration is separate from federal registration through the USPTO.
The fact that a Baton Rouge business can form a Louisiana LLC under a particular name does not establish that the name is available for federal trademark use or registration.
Another party may possess federal rights, Louisiana rights, rights established elsewhere, or common-law trademark rights in the same or a confusingly similar mark.
A Baton Rouge company preparing to invest substantially in a company name, energy technology, restaurant, healthcare service, software platform, manufactured product, consumer brand, or other commercial identity should therefore evaluate trademark availability separately from entity formation, trade-name registration, domain availability, and social-media handles.
LEARN ABOUT FEDERAL TRADEMARK REGISTRATION
Common Trademark Questions From Baton Rouge Businesses
Can a Baton Rouge business obtain a federal trademark registration?
Yes, assuming the applicable requirements of federal trademark law are satisfied.
Federal trademark registration is administered through the United States Patent and Trademark Office rather than by the State of Louisiana.
An application may be filed based on qualifying existing use of the mark in commerce. In appropriate circumstances, an applicant that has not yet begun qualifying use may instead file based on a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce.
For a Baton Rouge startup developing a technology, industrial service, software platform, healthcare product, restaurant concept, or other branded offering before launch, an intent-to-use application may sometimes allow the federal application process to begin while development continues.
LEARN ABOUT INTENT-TO-USE TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS
If my Baton Rouge business primarily serves Louisiana customers, can I still obtain a federal trademark?
Potentially, yes.
Federal trademark registration requires qualifying use in commerce, but that does not necessarily mean a business must maintain physical operations or provide services in at least two states.
The applicable federal standard concerns commerce that Congress may regulate and depends on the actual commercial activity involved.
A Baton Rouge company may sell goods through interstate distribution, serve customers from other states, provide online services, work through interstate supply chains, serve travelers, or otherwise engage in commerce within federal jurisdiction.
Whether particular activity satisfies the use-in-commerce requirement should therefore be evaluated based on the facts.
Does registering my company name in Louisiana mean I own the trademark?
Not necessarily.
Louisiana business registration, trade-name registration, state trademark registration, and federal trademark registration address different legal issues.
The Secretary of State permits preliminary searches for business-name availability, but specifically cautions that these searches are preliminary and that a more complete review occurs when business documents are submitted.
Even approval of a Louisiana business name does not constitute a determination by the USPTO that the name is available for federal trademark registration.
Trademark clearance should therefore be considered separately from forming a corporation or LLC, registering a trade name, purchasing a domain, or obtaining social-media accounts.
Should I conduct a trademark search before launching a Baton Rouge business?
In most cases, evaluating trademark availability before making substantial investments in a proposed brand is prudent.
A meaningful search should not focus only on identical names.
Potential conflicts may involve marks that differ in spelling, wording, pronunciation, appearance, meaning, or overall commercial impression when associated with sufficiently related goods or services.
Depending on the circumstances, a clearance review may consider federal applications and registrations, relevant marketplace use, state trademark records, business names, domains, and other potential sources of trademark rights.
For a Baton Rouge business investing in equipment, packaging, signage, software, product development, websites, menus, advertising, or other branded assets, identifying a significant problem before launch may provide considerably more flexibility.
LEARN ABOUT TRADEMARK CLEARANCE SEARCHES
Can I apply for a federal trademark before launching my Baton Rouge business?
Potentially, yes.
A Section 1(b) intent-to-use application allows an applicant with a bona fide intention to use a mark in commerce to begin pursuing federal trademark registration before qualifying commercial use has commenced.
The applicant must ultimately establish the required use before registration can issue.
This may be particularly useful for energy, technology, manufacturing, life sciences, restaurant, and consumer-product businesses that expect to spend substantially on development before public launch.
LEARN ABOUT INTENT-TO-USE TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS
What is a Statement of Use?
A Statement of Use is a filing used in a federal intent-to-use application after the USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance and the applicant has begun qualifying use of the mark in commerce.
The filing generally includes an allegation of use and an acceptable specimen demonstrating how the mark is actually used in connection with the relevant goods or services.
The Statement of Use should not be treated as a simple administrative formality.
The dates of use, specimen, owner information, and relationship between the mark and the identified goods or services must accurately reflect the applicant’s actual use.
If the applicant is not yet able to demonstrate qualifying use, extensions may be available within the limits permitted by federal law.
Should a Baton Rouge company register both its company name and product names?
Possibly.
A company may own several different trademarks.
One mark may identify the business itself, while additional marks identify particular products, technologies, software platforms, services, product families, or business programs.
A registration for the company’s primary name does not automatically create federal registrations for every separate product or service brand.
For a Baton Rouge industrial or technology company, for example, the corporate name may function as a house mark while separately branded products or services become important trademark assets in their own right.
Trademark portfolio planning should therefore consider which individual brands have sufficient commercial importance to justify separate clearance and registration.
Can a Baton Rouge restaurant or food business trademark its name?
Potentially, yes.
Restaurant names and other food-service brands can function as service marks when they identify the source of restaurant or related services and otherwise satisfy federal trademark requirements.
However, forming a Louisiana company, obtaining a local permit, purchasing a domain, or finding no identical restaurant in Baton Rouge does not establish trademark availability.
A proposed restaurant or food brand should be evaluated in relation to potentially similar marks and related goods or services.
This can be particularly important where a restaurant also plans to sell packaged foods, sauces, beverages, merchandise, or other branded goods because those offerings may create additional trademark considerations.
Can a Baton Rouge business trademark a phrase or slogan?
Potentially.
A phrase or slogan can function as a trademark when consumers understand it as identifying the source of particular goods or services and it otherwise satisfies applicable trademark requirements.
Not every phrase is registrable.
Wording may face issues involving descriptiveness, informational matter, ornamentation, failure to function, or potentially conflicting earlier marks.
A company planning substantial use of a slogan in advertisements, packaging, merchandise, websites, or other materials should therefore consider both registrability and clearance.
LEARN HOW TO TRADEMARK A PHRASE
What happens if the USPTO refuses my trademark application?
A USPTO Office Action does not necessarily mean that an application is finished.
An Office Action identifies substantive or procedural issues that must be addressed before the application can proceed.
Common substantive issues include likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act and mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1).
Applications may also encounter issues involving specimens, identification of goods and services, disclaimers, ownership, geographic wording, surnames, and other application requirements.
Cohn Legal represents applicants in evaluating and responding to substantive and procedural USPTO Office Actions.
LEARN ABOUT OFFICE ACTION RESPONSES
LEARN ABOUT SECTION 2(d) REFUSALS
What if another company applies to register a trademark similar to mine?
The appropriate strategy depends on the facts and the procedural status of the competing application.
Potential options may include submitting a Letter of Protest in appropriate circumstances, requesting an extension of time to oppose a published application, filing an opposition before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, pursuing settlement discussions, negotiating a consent or coexistence arrangement, or evaluating other enforcement options.
Cohn Legal represents trademark owners and applicants in contested proceedings before the TTAB.
LEARN ABOUT TRADEMARK OPPOSITIONS
Can a Baton Rouge company send a cease-and-desist letter over trademark use?
Potentially.
Whether a cease-and-desist letter is appropriate depends on the strength and scope of the trademark rights involved, priority, similarity between the marks, relatedness of the parties’ goods or services, marketplace conditions, and the business objectives of the trademark owner.
A similar name does not automatically establish infringement.
Before making a demand, a business should evaluate the legal basis for its position and the practical consequences of enforcement.
LEARN ABOUT TRADEMARK CEASE-AND-DESIST LETTERS
Do I need a trademark attorney located in Louisiana?
No.
Federal trademark applications and proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board are governed by federal law and administered through the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
A Baton Rouge business therefore does not need to retain an attorney who maintains a physical office in Louisiana merely because the business is located there.
Cohn Legal represents clients throughout the United States in federal trademark matters, including entrepreneurs, startups, energy businesses, manufacturers, technology companies, restaurants, healthcare ventures, and established brand owners located in Baton Rouge and elsewhere in Louisiana.
Consultations and ongoing representation for clients outside the firm’s physical office locations are generally conducted remotely.
Trademark Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board is the administrative tribunal within the USPTO responsible for deciding certain disputes concerning the right to register or maintain a federal trademark registration.
Cohn Legal represents both trademark applicants and trademark owners in TTAB opposition and cancellation proceedings.
An opposition generally arises when a party challenges a pending trademark application after publication.
A cancellation proceeding generally involves an effort to cancel an existing federal trademark registration on one or more legally recognized grounds.
TTAB proceedings can involve pleadings, discovery, interrogatories, document requests, depositions, evidentiary disputes, motions practice, summary judgment, testimony, trial briefing, settlement negotiations, and other contested issues.
Although the TTAB generally determines rights concerning federal trademark registration rather than awarding monetary damages for trademark infringement, a Board proceeding can have substantial consequences for a company’s ability to register, maintain, or expand an important brand.
LEARN ABOUT COHN LEGAL’S TTAB PRACTICE
Meet Trademark Attorney Avraham S.Z. Cohn
Avraham S.Z. Cohn, Esq.
Managing Partner, Cohn Legal, PLLC
Avraham S.Z. Cohn represents entrepreneurs, startups, established companies, and international businesses in federal trademark matters.
His practice includes trademark clearance and registrability analysis, federal trademark applications, responses to USPTO refusals, trademark oppositions and cancellations before the TTAB, cease-and-desist matters, trademark enforcement and defense, coexistence and consent agreements, assignments, licensing, international trademark protection, and portfolio strategy.
Mr. Cohn regularly represents trademark applicants and owners before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
VIEW AVRAHAM S.Z. COHN’S FULL BIOGRAPHY
Federal Trademark Experience
USPTO
Federal Trademark Prosecution
Trademark applications, Office Action responses, Statements of Use, extensions, post-registration matters, and related USPTO proceedings.
TTAB
Trademark Oppositions & Cancellations
Representation of trademark applicants and owners in contested proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Trademark Enforcement
Protection and Defense of Brand Rights
Cease-and-desist matters, infringement issues, settlement negotiations, coexistence agreements, and related enforcement strategy.
Nationwide
Federal Trademark Representation
Representation of businesses throughout the United States in federal trademark matters, including clients located in Athens and elsewhere in Georgia.
Why Baton Rouge Businesses Work With Cohn Legal
Trademark matters often involve considerably more than completing and submitting a federal application.
Cohn Legal assists clients with evaluating proposed brands before launch, conducting trademark clearance, developing filing strategies, responding to substantive USPTO refusals, navigating contested TTAB proceedings, enforcing established trademark rights, defending against infringement allegations, negotiating trademark-related agreements, and managing growing trademark portfolios.
For Baltimore businesses, trademark planning may intersect with life sciences, medical research, biotechnology, healthcare, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, manufacturing, logistics, creative industries, university commercialization, licensing, acquisitions, and expansion into national or international markets.
SCHEDULE A TRADEMARK CONSULTATION
Federal Trademark Resources
Businesses seeking additional information about federal trademark protection may consult the following primary legal and governmental resources.
United States Patent and Trademark Office
United States Patent and Trademark Office – Trademarks
Official information concerning federal trademark applications, registrations, maintenance, searching, and USPTO procedures.
Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure
Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP)
USPTO guidance concerning the examination and prosecution of federal trademark applications.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)
Official USPTO information concerning trademark oppositions, cancellations, appeals, and other Board proceedings.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure (TBMP)
Procedural guidance concerning practice before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq.
Lanham Act – 15 U.S.C. Chapter 22
The principal federal statutory framework governing trademarks and federal trademark registration in the United States.
Louisiana Trade Names, Trademarks and Service Marks
Louisiana Secretary of State – Business Forms & Fee Schedule
The Louisiana Secretary of State administers Louisiana trade-name, trademark, and service-mark filings, including registrations, reservations, assignments, and cancellations.
Louisiana Trademark Registration Form
Louisiana Secretary of State – Trade Name, Trademark & Service Mark Registration
The official state registration form identifies Louisiana’s state trademark filing requirements and requests information concerning the applicant, mark, relevant goods or services, classes, and dates of use.
About the Author
Avraham S.Z. Cohn, Esq.
Managing Partner, Cohn Legal, PLLC
Avraham S.Z. Cohn represents businesses and entrepreneurs in federal trademark prosecution, trademark enforcement and defense, and proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
VIEW AVRAHAM S.Z. COHN’S FULL BIOGRAPHY
Written and reviewed by Avraham S.Z. Cohn, Esq.
Last reviewed: September 2026
Speak With a Trademark Attorney
If you are launching a new brand, preparing a federal trademark application, responding to a USPTO refusal, evaluating a potential trademark conflict, or involved in a trademark opposition or cancellation proceeding, Cohn Legal can review the matter and discuss potential next steps.
START YOUR TRADEMARK REGISTRATION
SCHEDULE A TRADEMARK CONSULTATION